Null hypothesis
4/28: Randall Munroe clicks the "random article" link on Wikipedia and writes a comic based on its contents.
4/29: The article is vandalized.
Solution: Track Randall's Wikipedia usage and protect any page he spends more than a minute looking at. The page can safely be deprotected a week later.
Showing posts with label new. Show all posts
Showing posts with label new. Show all posts
Friday, April 29, 2011
Friday, April 15, 2011
886: Pripyat
Pripyat
You know, he could have just said "Chernobyl" and no wiki page would have been harmed in the making of the comic. Just sayin'.
You know, he could have just said "Chernobyl" and no wiki page would have been harmed in the making of the comic. Just sayin'.
Wednesday, March 23, 2011
876: Plato's Cave
Allegory of the Cave
You guessed it. Any topic I find myself personally needing to look up on Wikipedia has a very high likelihood of getting vandalized.
You guessed it. Any topic I find myself personally needing to look up on Wikipedia has a very high likelihood of getting vandalized.
Monday, October 11, 2010
804: Pumpkin Carving
Banach-Tarski paradox
A "round about reference" definitely merits a place in the external links section.
A "round about reference" definitely merits a place in the external links section.
Saturday, October 9, 2010
800: Beautiful Dream
The Rules
Yes, this strikes me as the sort of page with a definite need for an "In Popular Culture" section.
Yes, this strikes me as the sort of page with a definite need for an "In Popular Culture" section.
803: Airfoil
Airfoil
Thumbs up if you're an idiot.
It's like they know it's going to get reverted anyway, so they don't bother with subtlety anymore.
Thumbs up if you're an idiot.
It's like they know it's going to get reverted anyway, so they don't bother with subtlety anymore.
Friday, October 1, 2010
800: The Rules
The Rules
Thought question: How popular does something have to be before you can call it "In Popular Culture"?
Thought question: How popular does something have to be before you can call it "In Popular Culture"?
Wednesday, September 15, 2010
792: Password Reuse
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1997&action=history
I'm just going to leave that right here.
I'm just going to leave that right here.
Wednesday, July 14, 2010
Friday, May 14, 2010
740: The Tell-Tale Beat
Daft Punk
So funny we vandalized it twice!
The page for Tell-Tale Heart wasn't actually vandalized, leading me to the theory that the caliber of genius that resorts to this behavior is not aware of the reference.
So funny we vandalized it twice!
The page for Tell-Tale Heart wasn't actually vandalized, leading me to the theory that the caliber of genius that resorts to this behavior is not aware of the reference.
Thursday, May 13, 2010
Lies, lies, dirty lies
Randall claims not to have foreseen exactly what would come of posting a Wikipedia-related comic.
For extra laffs, see theidiot wonderful individual who didn't catch that the "disambiguation" reference was an attempt at a joke as well as the responses thereto.
For extra laffs, see the
Tuesday, May 11, 2010
739: Malamanteau
Uh-oh, Randall made a Wikipedia-themed comic!
Edit: For clarification, the page didn't exist before yesterday (I think), but there have been countless attempts to create it since. As of last night, the page was a deletion log; today, it redirects to xkcd. The interesting stuff is, as usual, in the discussion and history pages.
Edit: For clarification, the page didn't exist before yesterday (I think), but there have been countless attempts to create it since. As of last night, the page was a deletion log; today, it redirects to xkcd. The interesting stuff is, as usual, in the discussion and history pages.
Monday, May 10, 2010
738: Operation
Yes, I'm lazy.
But more importantly, someone thought this would be funny. Tell me which is more appalling!
But more importantly, someone thought this would be funny. Tell me which is more appalling!
Friday, March 5, 2010
710: Collatz Conjecture
Collatz conjecture
The Adam Conjecture: If fans have to look it up, it will be vandalized. (Check the edit history forover 9000 a ton of unfunny internet meme edits starting March 5.)
The Adam Conjecture: If fans have to look it up, it will be vandalized. (Check the edit history for
Monday, February 22, 2010
Saturday, February 20, 2010
704: Principle of Explosion
Principle of explosion
"If you run a webcomic, you can reference it in any Wikipedia article. It's called the principle of xkcd."
"Any Wikipedia article? Let me try."
"If you run a webcomic, you can reference it in any Wikipedia article. It's called the principle of xkcd."
"Any Wikipedia article? Let me try."
Tuesday, February 16, 2010
Monday, February 1, 2010
Twofer
695: Spirit rover
"Perhaps." Huh.
696: Prisoner's dilemma
Yeah, that's germaine.
I'm not dead! Just busy! This blog still updates, ladies and gentlemen.
"Perhaps." Huh.
696: Prisoner's dilemma
Yeah, that's germaine.
I'm not dead! Just busy! This blog still updates, ladies and gentlemen.
Saturday, January 2, 2010
Playing catch-up
Hello, internet. I am back from vacation. Let's see what I missed OH MY GOODNESS
681: Gravitational wells
Yes. This deserves to be in the introduction. Absolutely.
682: Erotic asphyxiation
Curse you for making me look up this article, Randall Munroe. Incidentally, including a reference to Wikipedia inside of the actual comic is a guarantee that Wikipedia will be vandalized as a result of the comic.
Oh, and the edit in question is particularly awful.
681: Gravitational wells
Yes. This deserves to be in the introduction. Absolutely.
682: Erotic asphyxiation
Curse you for making me look up this article, Randall Munroe. Incidentally, including a reference to Wikipedia inside of the actual comic is a guarantee that Wikipedia will be vandalized as a result of the comic.
Oh, and the edit in question is particularly awful.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)